Monroe Doctrine

In 1823, President James Monroe issued what became known as the Monroe Doctrine, warning European powers against further colonization or interference in the New World. Though never codified into law or treaty, the doctrine became a guiding principle of U.S. foreign policy, invoked and reinterpreted by successive administrations to assert American influence in the hemisphere. Theodore Roosevelt expanded it, Barack Obama’s administration declared it obsolete, and Donald Trump revived its assertive tone. Its malleability is hailed by some as its strength, denounced by others as its greatest flaw.

The Monroe Doctrine became a symbolic fence around the Western Hemisphere, a firewall against nineteenth‑century imperial powers. Over the next two centuries, it evolved through corollaries, confrontations, and periods of dormancy. Today, in the shadow of Chinese expansion, mainly through its Belt and Road Initiative, Latin American states are drawn to twenty‑first‑century infrastructure with age‑old colonialism lurking in the background. But the Chinese buying influence in the hemisphere is aimed directly at the United States, seeking to erode its traditional dominance and reshape regional loyalties.

The Monroe Doctrine was intended to thwart enemies, potential and real, at the gate. With the exception of Cuba, it largely succeeded through the twentieth century. The 21st century now poses a test of whether the doctrine still has teeth.

If conflict with China is fated, then the United States must first secure its own backyard. The Western Hemisphere cannot be a distraction or a liability, a source of angst and trouble. Before turning its full strategic gaze toward the Middle Kingdom, the U.S. must seal the gates of the New World.

The Monroe Doctrine was written mainly by President Monroe’s Secretary of State, John Quincy Adams. It aimed to support Latin American independence movements from Spain and Portugal, while discouraging Russian influence in the Pacific Northwest and preventing the Holy Alliance: Russia, Austria, Prussia, and France, from restoring monarchs in the Americas. But the doctrine was not all sword: the United States also pledged not to interfere in Europe’s internal affairs or its colonies.

In the early 1800s, the United States lacked the ability to enforce such a bargain militarily. Britain, however, was more than willing to use its naval fleet to guarantee access to New World markets and discourage competition.

By the beginning of the twentieth century, Theodore Roosevelt invoked and expanded the doctrine, effectively making the United States the policeman of the Western Hemisphere. During the Cold War, it was used to counter Soviet influence in Cuba, Nicaragua, and Grenada.

By the 1970s the South American drug trade was declared a national security threat and the War on Drugs began with Colombia the epicenter of hostilities. In 1981, U.S. Congress amended the Posse Comitatus Act to allow military involvement in domestic drug enforcement, extending to Latin America. President Ronald Reagan’s 1986 National Security Decision Directive 221 declared drug trafficking a U.S. national security threat, authorizing military operations abroad, including in Colombia.

After the Cold War, the doctrine faded from explicit policy. In November 2013, Secretary of State John Kerry declared at the Organization of American States that “the era of the Monroe Doctrine is over,” framing a shift toward partnership and mutual respect with Latin America rather than unilateral dominance. By 2020 Colombia’s coca production had hit a new high.

Today, China’s Belt and Road Initiative, port construction and acquisitions, telecom infrastructure, and rare earth diplomacy have carved influence into Latin America and the Caribbean. In this context, the Monroe Doctrine was not asleep but, in a coma, its toes occasionally twitching.

Re-invigorating the Monroe Doctrine is not about making true allies and friends but removing vulnerabilities. The goal is not to bring these nations into the fold but to remove them from Beijing’s orbit.

By mid-2025 official statements claim that ~10% of the U.S. Navy is deployed to counter drug threats, ostensibly from Venezuela and Columbia. But fleet positioning hints at a different story. Most assets are stationed near Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, and Guantánamo Bay, closer to Cuba than Caracas. Surveillance flights, submarine patrols, and chokepoint monitoring center on the Florida Straits, Windward Passage, and Yucatán Channel.

This may suggest strategic misdirection. Venezuela is the declared theater, but Cuba is the operational keystone. The U.S. may be deflecting attention from its true concern: Chinese or Russian entrenchment in Cuba and the northern Caribbean.

The Monroe Doctrine began as a warning to monarchs across the Atlantic. In the late twentieth century, it morphed into a war on drugs. Today it reappears as a repurposed drug war, flickering as a warning to Beijing across the Pacific. Whether it awakens as policy or remains sleight of hand, its enduring role is to remind the world that the Western Hemisphere is not a theater for distraction but a stage the United States will guard against intrusion. In the twenty‑first century, its test is not whether it can inspire allies, but whether it can deny adversaries a foothold in America’s backyard.

Graphic: Monroe Doctrine by Victor Gillam, 1896. Public Domain.

Beginnings

A recent ScienceDaily write‑up titled “Scientists just found the hidden cosmic fingerprints of dark matter” suggests a breakthrough in the elusive substance that binds galaxies together. In reality, the study reports that Lyman‑Alpha emitters are a transient phenomenon, interesting, but nowhere near the revolutionary advance implied by the headline.

For readers uninitiated in cosmology and astrophysics, that’s a lot of jargon at once. So let’s bring it down a notch with some plain definitions.

Dark matter is the invisible mass that holds galaxies together through gravity. Without it, galaxies would fly apart. We infer its existence only because galaxies behave as they do. It makes up about 27% of the universe’s total energy density. By comparison, ordinary matter, the stuff we can see and measure, accounts for a measly 5%. Dark energy, the mysterious driver of cosmic acceleration, contributes about 68%. But that’s a story for another day.

Lyman‑Alpha emitters (LAEs) are distant, generally low‑mass galaxies that shine in Lyman‑alpha radiation: ultraviolet light produced when a hydrogen electron drops from the second energy level to the ground state (n=2 → n=1). Because this light is strongly redshifted by cosmic expansion, LAEs act as beacons of the early universe. Observing the ones implied in the opening science press headline means looking back to a time when the cosmos was less than a billion years old.

Scientists examine the clustering of LAEs across three epochs, each marking a milestone in cosmic evolution, a page from the manuscript of creation. At a redshift of 6, when the universe was about 0.9 to 1.0 billion years old, roughly 12.8 billion years ago, the first galaxies and stars were re‑ionizing neutral hydrogen, lifting the primordial fog and making the universe transparent. This period is known as the Epoch of Reionization.

The next epoch, at a redshift of 5.7 (about 100 million years later, or 12.7 billion years ago), is called the Late Reionization / Transition Epoch. Here, scientists measure how quickly the fog of neutral hydrogen dissipated and how galaxies began to cluster. Clustering serves as a proxy for the gravitational wells of dark matter, which drew in and anchored ordinary matter.

Finally, at a redshift of 3, around 11.8 billion years ago, the Post‑Reionization Epoch reveals a more mature universe with large‑scale structures taking shape. LAEs in this era trace galaxy clustering and help infer the masses of the dark matter halos they inhabit. These halos are vast, spherical envelopes of unseen matter surrounding galaxies and clusters.

With this groundwork, we return to the science press claim that researchers have found the “fingerprints” of dark matter itself. In truth, the fingerprints show no loops or swirls, no identification of what dark matter is or how it is distributed, only confirmation of what is already established. Without dark matter, galaxies would not exist. It is, in essence, a Cartesian maxim: I gather, therefore I am. Nothing more. Nothing less.

There was, however, a genuine insight. Lyman‑alpha emitters are transient, short‑lived luminous phases in galaxies that trace the framework of dark matter. The clustering function does not reveal dark matter’s nature; it just shows how rarely baryonic light, the real stuff of frogs, men, and cybertrucks aligns with gravitational tugs.

This raises a deeper question: why does dark matter clump at all, instead of remaining uniform across the cosmos? The answer lies in gravitational instability. Minute quantum fluctuations in the infant universe were stretched to cosmic scales by inflation, imprinting faint density variations, ripples in spacetime itself (if time exists is another a question for a different day). Cold, non‑interacting dark matter streamed into these wells, not merely seeking density but becoming it, deepening the imprints and laying the invisible scaffolding upon which galaxies and clusters would later rise. In turn, the growing clumps reinforced the very variations that seeded them, a feedback loop that sculpted the universe’s large‑scale structure. Quantum fractures first, dark matter responding.

And yet another knot: where did dark matter come from? If it does not interact, how could it be born from interaction? Perhaps it is not a product of the Big Bang at all. Did it exist outside the Bang, or was it a transformation from an earlier state?

Unto the spirit of dark energy, the expansive gust that stretches spacetime, accelerating the universe’s drift into an ever‑expanding horizon. If dark matter is transformation, is dark energy its continuation, or merely a phase toward dissolution?

Together they form a cosmic tension: cohesion and dispersal, gathering and vanishing. The Big Bang may not be the beginning, but only the first visible flare in a manuscript already dictated eons before the dawn.

In this reframing, baryonic matter: atoms, stars, flesh, machines, is a late arrival. Bone, blood, and silicone are ritual sparks, flaring briefly in the gravitational wells carved by dark matter and stretched by dark energy. We are not the fathers of the universe, but the children of a violent past.

Dark matter is the glue. Dark energy erases the image. We are but the punctuation; marks in a manuscript whose lines were written long before our arrival.

Source: …Fingerprints of Dark Matter, Science Daily, Sept. 2025. ODIN: Clustering Analysis… by Herrera et al, Astrophysical Journal Letters, 2025. Graphic: Lyman-Alpha Galaxy Up Close Illustration by M. Wiss, 2009. Public Domain

Michel de Montaigne Bergerac 2019

Bordeaux Red Blends from Southwest, France

Merlot 60%, Cabernet Franc 20%, Cabernet Sauvignon 20%

Purchase Price $16.99

Wine Enthusiast 90, Wilfred Wong 90, ElsBob 90

ABV 14%

A clear ruby to purple wine in color. A medium to full bodied wine with aromas of red and black fruits and spice. On the palate plums and cherries predominant with oak derivatives. The tannins are meaty and balanced with crisp acidity. A beautiful finish that will compliment most beef dishes.

An excellent fine wine at a very attractive price. Current prices range from $13.50-18.00.

Trivia:  Michel de Montaigne was likely the most influential philosopher of the 16th-century French Renaissance. A dyed-in-the-wool skeptic, a cantankerous crank whose motto Que sais-je? (“What do I know?”) enshrined his worldview; much like Socrates, who also claimed to know nothing. Montaigne questioned everything and taught that doubt was the only path to wisdom.

But he carried it too far: intellectually thin and logically obtuse. He believed that customs and morals were cultural artifacts, lacking any universal tether. Truth, for Montaigne, was a matter of perspective; malleable, contingent, shaped by accepted practice. One man’s cannibal was another man’s epicurean.

To anchor this relativism, he wrote: “We are, I know not how, double in ourselves, so that what we believe we disbelieve, and cannot rid ourselves of what we condemn.” A long-winded version of c’est la vie (“that’s life”), or more precisely, à chacun son goût (“to each his own”).

Experience was his shrine, but it lacked a foundation. No base of knowledge to anchor belief. A man easily swayed by his own prejudices and lack of a black and white moral code.

His philosophy of go-along-to-get-along, born of tolerance and introspection, risked becoming a prescription for annihilation, not of others, but of moral clarity and oneself. A path to accepting everything and believing nothing. A philosophy polished so smooth it reflects everything and reveals nothing.

BLS or BS Employment Statistics

Every first Friday of the month markets gather like sinful parishioners awaiting Pavlov’s bell, the gospel according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). The numbers descend from the mount, etched in holy government letterhead. Jobs added, jobs lost, unemployment rate up, unemployment rate down, labor force swelling or shrinking. And the market screams, up or down, as if the deity of statistics has spoken to the profits of capitalism.

Expectations unmet? The elevator drops. Expectations exceeded? Euphoria ascends. Every stinking first Friday the ritual repeats. Buyers and sellers beware.

The markets, seasoned by countless cycles of god-awful truth and revision, know the numbers are suspect. Model-based, massaged and provisional, destined for downward revisions not once, not twice, but likely thrice. And everyone knows this. Logic says to remain circumspect. Religion says yell hallelujah.

But they react like Charlie Brown charging towards Lucy’s planted football, full of conviction and hope that this time it’s real. No, it’s a con of smoke and mirrors, a ritual sealed with a wink and nod from Lucy. A trust not earned.

For Charlie Brown, it’s not just a kick, but a ritual of belief. A sprint to a promise of truth and redemption. This first Friday, the numbers will be true. This time the markets aren’t the chump. But then the revisions put you flat on your back in the muddy turf.

This isn’t market ignorance, just the willful need to believe. To believe in a clear signal in a noisy world. Maybe this Lucy keeps her word. Maybe this time the BLS can count timecards.

The U.S. labor market is a statistical mirage and the BLS is the magician. A clumsy one at that. Given the scale of the U.S. labor force the BLS sample is statistical noise superimposed on a trendline, and the trend itself shaped by the unreliable Birth-Death Model.

The Birth-Death Model estimates job creation from new businesses (births) and closed businesses (deaths) that aren’t captured in their monthly survey sample. The BLS’s Current Employment Statistics (CES) survey covers about 122,000 businesses each month, but it can’t track firms that just opened or shut down. Since new firms don’t immediately appear in the sample, and closed firms may linger as ghosts in the data, the BLS uses a statistical model to estimate their net effect on employment.

The model has two main components. Imputed deaths are estimated from trends for similar firms. For example, if 3 out 4 newly created restaurants fail annually, the model adjusts employment accordingly. The other component forecasts net job changes using historical data from the Quarterly Census Employment and Wages (QCEW).

The model’s assumptions presume that today’s labor market mirrors yesterday’s. It somewhat works in stable times but thoroughly breaks down when the sharp kinks of recessions and recoveries are introduced into the system. Also, business owners fail to report their failures, quickly—go figure. BLS just finds it is too much work to keep track of them all. A brief detour, if you’ll indulge it, is worth mentioning here. I was standing in line at the local US Post Office and a customer in front of me, after much back-and-forth discussion, showed a photo of a misdelivered package to the postal clerk. The clerk lit up in cheerful vindication. “Oh that wasn’t us. We don’t have time to take pictures of our deliveries.” The BLS operates with similar blind spots. Ghosts in the data, and no time to chase them.

Now back to our regularly scheduled harangue. All the BLS assumptions in their Birth-Death Model leads to inevitable revisions. The model is the altar. The CES survey, is the smoke, wafting over a ritualized trend.

In practice, this means employment is overstated during downturns and understated during booms with the actual numbers taking another 3-12 months to correct. By then, the market had moved on. The altar cleared. The smoke dispersed. And the ghosts remain.

But there is hope, but only for the patient.

ADP, Automatic Data Processing, offers a monthly employment snapshot that often outpaces the BLS. Released each Wednesday before the government’s numbers, the ADP National Employment Report draws from payroll data covering 26 million workers. No government jobs. No statistical smoke. Just raw payrolls. It consistently lands closer to the QCEW gold standard, though still misses the mark, just not as wildly as the BLS.

Between March 2024 and March 2025, QCEW, the altar of actual payroll filings, reported a net gain of 675,000 jobs. BLS, guided by surveys and the Birth-Death Model, claimed 1.79 million. ADP, closer but still adrift, reported 1.69 million.

Together, ADP and BLS conjure the headlines that move markets. But their numbers are unreliable. Why bother? A million-job error in a labor force of 167 million is less than 1%. A rounding error. A statistical ghost.

Ghosts in the data. Smoke in the temple. Floating through the firmament. By the time the truth arrives the markets have moved on.

Building Confidence, Living Boldly: A Practical and Playful Guide to Becoming Your Best Self

(Note: The following is a guest post by Emilia Ross. She is a life coach who specializes in helping individuals navigate their personal and professional lives. Visit her site at Schedule-Life.com)

Confidence isn’t a personality trait — it’s a skill you can build. Whether you’re chasing a promotion, learning to dance, or just trying to quiet that inner critic, confidence grows from small wins compounded daily.
You don’t need to reinvent yourself. You just need to strengthen what’s already there — the habits, people, and moments that make you feel most alive.

The Takeaway
Confidence = habits + people + purpose.
Start small, speak kindly to yourself, set micro-goals, and spend more time around those who remind you who you are — not who you’re not.


How Confidence Works
Confidence grows from three layers of daily practice:

LayerWhat It MeansQuick Actions
MindTraining your thoughts to support, not sabotage you.Practice three minutes of gratitude journaling daily.
BodyMoving and nourishing yourself so your mind believes you’re capable.Go for a 20-minute walk or stretch after work.
CommunitySurrounding yourself with people who lift you.Schedule one call a week with someone positive.


FAQ – Confidence Myths Busted
Q1. Is confidence something you’re born with?
–No. It’s learned through repetition and reflection, like a muscle you strengthen over time.
Q2. What if I constantly compare myself to others?
–That’s normal. Shift from comparison to curiosity: what can you learn from them?
Q3. How do I stay confident when I fail?
–See mistakes as feedback, not failure. Every confident person has a “failure résumé.”

Step-by-Step Checklist: How to Boost Your Confidence

  1. Set one daily micro-goal.
    –Example: “Speak up once in today’s meeting.”
  2. Do something uncomfortable — on purpose.
    –Confidence grows when comfort zones shrink.
  3. Keep a “proof list.”
    –Record moments when you acted bravely or made progress.
  4. Declutter your digital world.
    –Unfollow accounts that drain you. Follow those that educate or inspire.
  5. Revisit your wins weekly.
    –Confidence thrives on reflection, not randomness

Make Connection Your Secret Weapon
Confidence isn’t built in isolation — it’s nurtured through connection. Invite friends over for a dinner, a movie night, or a simple get-together to celebrate everyday life. Spending time with people who make you laugh, listen, and care reminds you that you’re already enough.
To make your gathering special, use a free invitation maker to stand out. You can customize templates, adjust fonts, add images, and design something that perfectly matches your style. It’s easy, creative, and adds a personal touch to your confidence practice.

Helpful Tools and Resources
Here are some tools and platforms that can support your confidence journey:


Product Spotlight: The Momentum Journal
Sometimes structure helps. The Momentum Journal offers a clean, minimalist layout for tracking daily progress, gratitude, and personal wins. It’s designed to help you see your growth — a simple but powerful confidence booster. 

Seven Fast Habits for Everyday Confidence

  1. Smile at strangers.
  2. Speak slowly; it signals calm assurance.
  3. Wear something that makes you feel strong.
  4. Do one thing you’ve been avoiding.
  5. Compliment others sincerely.
  6. Stand or sit tall; posture changes perception.
  7. Celebrate small wins like big ones.

Confidence isn’t the absence of fear — it’s the courage to move forward despite it. Start small, stay consistent, and surround yourself with people and tools that help you grow. Your best life isn’t waiting for a perfect moment; it’s unfolding right now, one intentional, brave step at a time.

Zenato Alanera Rosso 2020

Red Blends Other from Veneto, Italy

Corvina 70%, Rondinella 10%, Corvinone 10%, Merlot and Cabernet Sauvignon 10%

Purchase Price: $15.99

Wine Enthusiast 90, ElsBob 91

ABV 13.5%

A medium garnet with a tawny rim in color. A medium-bodied wine with aromas of cherries and coffee. On the palate a touch of sweetness and plums, easy tannins and an acidity that provides a refreshing finish.

An excellent table wine at very nice price. Current price is about $17.00.

Trivia: Veneto wine region of northeastern Italy stretches from the canals of Venice to the Alpine foothills. Viticulture here dates to Roman times, with early vineyards tended by local tribes. During the height of the Venetian Republic, paralleling the fortunes of Florentine Renaissance, Veneto became a hub for wine blending and trade, shipping its product throughout the Mediterranean Basin, Byzantine and Ottoman Territories, Northern Europe, and along the Silk Road all the way to Mongolia. This hemispheric reach not only spread winemaking techniques but elevated the reputation of Veneto wines.

At the end of Republic in the 1797 winemaking was in a slow, constant decline. The erosion of trade routes, driven by the Republic’s ossified and hidebound bureaucracy and maritime collapse, decimated the region’s commercial infrastructure. Recovery began in the late 18th and into the 19th century, not as a revival of trans-national trade but as a scientific and agrarian rebirth. Improved farming techniques and increased vineyard plantings were initially focused on local consumption. Today, Veneto is Italy’s top wine-producing region, accounting for roughly 25% of the country’s output and over 35% of its exports. Prosecco and Pinot Grigio occupy the region’s power positions in volume, anchoring its global presence.

Hamlet Goes to Milwaukee—A Tragicomedy in Five Acts

Prolepsis’ Prologue:

The Chorus enters. A single spotlight. A single Damocles’ bullet hangs in the air like a haunted ghost spinning to history’s rhythms and trajectories.

CHORUS:

John Schrank shoots Theodore Roosevelt, 113 long and mostly forgotten years ago, in Milwaukee, Wisconsin on a sharp and chilled Monday, coats pulled tight, 14 October 1912.

That’s the end, my friend, or so it seems. But tragedy demands context, and context demands sacramental passings. Let us reset and reconfigure the scene, with a sentimental barbershop quartet interlude of ‘Moonlight Bay’ drifting in the background and summon the ghosts of campaigns past and the raving refrains of the mad, all served with a bullet.

Act I: The Bull Rising

Before the Bull Moose and the bullet there was tradition and restraint. Before Roosevelt charged up the hill and across the plains, there was McKinley’s calm firmament.

William McKinley, 25th President of the United States, governed with a philosophy of calculated prosperity and protective nationalism, fittingly called the Ohio Napoleon, holding folksy court on America’s front porch. He was deliberate and firm but never rash, he was a Republican loyalist second, leader first, and a quiet expansionist, A Civil War veteran and devout Methodist, McKinley championed high tariffs, the gold standard, and industrial growth as the pillars of American strength.

His first term (1897–1901) unfolded as an economic recovery from Grover Cleveland’s faltering presidency and the Panic of 1893. It was marked by economic stabilization, the Spanish-American War, and the acquisition of overseas territories: Puerto Rico, Guam, the Philippines, and Hawaii, all additions to America’s imperial structure.

His vice president, Garret Hobart died, of heart failure in 1899 at the age of 55. With no constitutional mechanism to fill the vacancy, the office remained vacant until McKinley’s re-election. It wasn’t until the ratification of the 25th Amendment in 1967 that a formal process was established to replace a vice president.

In 1900, Theodore Roosevelt, then Governor of New York and war hero of the San Juan Hill, was chosen as McKinley’s running mate. His nomination was largely a strategy of containment: an attempt to temper his reformist zeal beneath the inconsequential and ceremonial weight of the vice-presidency.

Act II: Bull Cometh

The Bull Moose was buried beneath ceremony, but symbols cannot contain momentum. The front porch would give way to the lists and charging steeds.

On September 6, 1901, President William McKinley stood beneath the vaulted glass of the Temple of Music at the Pan-American Exposition in Buffalo, New York, an American shrine to progress, electricity, and imperial optimism. There, in the charged glow of modernity, he was shot twice in the abdomen by Leon Czolgosz, a Polish American self-declared anarchist and bitter subject of the Panic of 1893 and its resultant mill closures, strikes and wage collapse, etched into his disillusioned psyche.

Czolgosz had been baptized in the radical writings of Emma Goldman, a Lithuanian emigree and firebrand of the American radical left. Goldman championed anarchism, women’s rights, and sexual liberation. She founded Mother Earth, a journal that became an infamous intellectual hearth for dissent and revolutionary analysis.

To Czolgosz, Mckinley was the embodiment of oppression: capitalism, imperialism, and state violence. His answer to these perceived provocations was violence. Concealing a revolver wrapped in a handkerchief, he fired at close range during a public reception, just as McKinley extended his hand in welcome.

Initially, doctors believed McKinley would recover. But gangrene developed around the damaged pancreas, and he died on 14th of September. His death was slow and tragic, a symbolic collapse of the front porch presidency.

Roosevelt, just 42, stepped up and became the youngest president in U.S. history (JFK was 43). With containment at an end, the Bull broke loose. And he mounted the stage with an agenda.

Act III: The Charge of the Bull

The Bull builds a protective legacy of words and stick, sweat and blood.

Roosevelt’s early presidency honored McKinley’s legacy: trust-busting, tariff moderation, and economic expansion. But he soon added his own signature: conservationism, progressive reform, and a bold, moralistic foreign policy.

He preserved 230 million acres of public land and established the U.S. Forest Service, 5 national parks, 18 national monuments, 150 national forests and a constellation wildlife refuges. Stewardship of the land became a sacred ideal that continues to present day.

In foreign affairs, Roosevelt extended the Monroe Doctrine with his Roosevelt Corollary (1904), asserting that the U.S. had the right to intervene in Latin America to prevent “chronic wrongdoing.” It was a doctrinal pivot from passive hemispheric defense against European imperialism to active imperial stewardship, cloaked in the language of civilization and order. America became the self-appointed policeman of the Western Hemisphere.

The corollary was a response to incidents like the 1902 Venezuelan debt crisis where European navies blockaded ports to force repayment. In Cuba, unrest was quelled with U.S. troops in 1906. Nicaragua, Haiti, and Honduras saw repeated interventions to protect U.S. interests and suppress revolutions. If Latin American failed to maintain order or financial solvency, the U.S. would intervene to stabilize rather than colonize.

The doctrine justified the U.S. dominance of the Panama Canal and set the precedent for Cold War interventions, neutralizing the American back yard while containing Soviet expansion in the east.

Act IV: Hamlet in Milwaukee

Heads of kings rest uneasy. Ghosts of injustice haunt. Princes fall prey.

After winning a full term in 1904, Roosevelt honored his promise not to seek reelection in 1908. But disillusioned with his successor, William Howard Taft, Roosevelt returned to politics in 1912, forming the Progressive Party, nicknamed the Bull Moose Party.

Enter stage left, John Schrank, a former barkeep plagued by visions and imagined slights. In the early morning hours of 15 September 1901, 6 days after McKinley was shot and 2 days before he died, the bar tender dreamt that the slain President rose from his casket and pointed to a shrouded figure in the corner: Roosevelt. “Avenge my death”, the ghost spoke. Schrank claimed to forget the dream for over a decade, until Roosevelt’s bid for a third term in 1912 reawakened the vision, which he now interpreted as a divine command.

Schrank believed Roosevelt’s third-term ambition was a betrayal of American tradition set forth in Washington’s Farewell Address. He hated Roosevelt and feared that he would win the election, seize dictatorial power, and betray the constitutional republic. In his delusional state, he believed Roosevelt was backed by foreign powers and was planning to take over the Panama Canal; an anachronistic fear, given total U.S. control of the canal since 1904. Schrank interpreted the ghost’s voice as God’s will: “Let no murderer occupy the presidential chair for a third term. Avenge my death.”

At his trial for the attempted assassination of Roosevelt, Schrank was remanded to a panel of experts to determine his mental competency. They deemed him insane, a “paranoid schizophrenic”, in the language of the time. He was committed to an asylum, where he remained until his death 31 years later.

Schrank’s madness parallels the haunted introspection of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark. Shakespeare’s longest and most psychologically complex tragedy that revolves around a ghost’s command: “Revenge my foul and most unnatural murder.” Hamlet, driven by the specter’s charge, spirals into feigned (and perhaps real) madness, wrestling with betrayal, duty, mortality, and metaphysical doubt. His uncle, the murderer, has married his mother; an Oedipal inversion within the world’s most enduring tragedy.

On 14 October 1912, as Roosevelt stood outside Milwaukee’s Gilpatrick Hotel, Schrank stepped forward and fired. The bullet pierced his steel glasses case and a folded 50-page tome of a speech, slowing its path. Bleeding, a bullet lodged in his chest, Roosevelt refused medical attention. He stepped onto the stage and spoke for 90 minutes, although it is said that due to his loss of blood, he shortened his speech out of necessity. Whether for himself or the audience is lost to history.

Unlike Hamlet, who dithers and soliloquizes his way toward a graveyard of corpses, Schrank shoots, hits, and leaves Roosevelt standing. Hamlet’s tragedy ends in death and metaphysical rupture. Schrank’s farce begins with the demands of a ghost and ends with a 90-minute speech. One prince takes his world with him into death. The other absorbs a bullet and keeps talking.

Act V: Ghosts and Republics

Ghosts and Republics are ephemeral. At the end of time; those fleeting moments, short and long; some, as Proust says, more and more seldom, are best treated with humor and grace.

In tragedy and near calamity, a man’s soul becomes visible. Some are seen darkly, others, bright, clear, unshaken and unafraid of new beginnings even if that beginning is death.

Roosevelt had already charged up San Juan Hill, bullets and fragments whistling past like invitations to a funeral ball. Each a death marker. So, when a solitary bullet from a madman struck him in Milwaukee, it was merely an inconvenience. He quipped: “Friends, I shall ask you to be as quiet as possible. I don’t know whether you fully understand that I have just been shot, but it takes more than that to kill a Bull Moose.”

Sixty-eight years later, Reagan too survived a bullet to the chest. As he was wheeled into the emergency room at George Washington University Hospital, he said he’d “rather be in Philadelphia,” a throwback to his vaudeville days, a gag line used on fake tombstones: “Here lies Bob: he’d rather be in Philadelphia.” W.C. Fields once requested it as his epitaph. He’s buried in California. To the surgeons, Reagan added: “I hope you’re all Republicans.”

Where Roosevelt offered mettle, Reagan offered mirth. Both answered violence with theatrical defiance: natural-born and unshakable leaders, unbothered by the ghosts that tracked them.

They were not alone. Jackson, beat his would-be-assassin with a cane. Truman kept his appointments after gunfire at Blair house. Ford faced two attempts in seventeen days and kept walking. Bush stood unfazed after a grenade failed to detonate. They met their specters with grace, a joke, and a shrug.

The assassins and would-be assassins vanished into the diffusing whisps of history. The leaders of men left a republic haunted not by ghosts, but by a living memory: charged with the courage to endure and to imagine greatness.

Graphic: Assassination of President McKinley by Achille Beltrame, 1901. Public Domain.

Managing Stress in Everyday Life: Strategies for Calm and Clarity

(Note: The following is a guest post by Emilia Ross. She is a life coach who specializes in helping individuals navigate their personal and professional lives. Visit her site at Schedule-Life.com)

Stress is an unavoidable part of modern life, affecting everything from focus and energy to overall well-being. The good news is that with the right strategies, it can be managed — even transformed — into a source of strength and clarity. By combining mindful awareness, physical movement, and small daily rituals, anyone can reduce overwhelm and regain control. This article explores proven methods to help you create calm, build resilience, and thrive amid life’s everyday pressures.


Quick Summary

Stress is a natural signal, not an enemy. When managed through awareness, structure, and small, consistent practices, it becomes a guide to better energy and focus. Core strategies include mindful awareness, physical activity, digital boundaries, and restorative routines.


Understanding Everyday Stress

Stress arises when your perceived demands exceed your perceived capacity. While occasional stress can improve performance, chronic stress erodes resilience. Learning to interpret and respond — not just react — is key.


The Foundations of Stress Management

1. Awareness First

Recognize your triggers. Start with a simple journal or app like Daylio to log moments of tension and what caused them. Awareness precedes regulation.

2. Physical Reset

Move your body regularly. Even a 10-minute walk, yoga session on Yoga With Adriene, or quick stretch can interrupt stress loops and lower cortisol.

3. Mental Reframing

Your interpretation drives your physiology. Practices like cognitive reframing teach you to challenge unhelpful patterns.

4. Social Anchors

Stay connected. Meaningful interactions — a chat with a friend, a shared meal — activate oxytocin, a natural stress buffer. Try setting small rituals like “Sunday check-ins” or joining supportive communities.


Checklist: Daily Stress Reset Protocol

✅ Breathe deeply for 2 minutes, twice daily
✅ Take one screen-free walk
✅ Replace doomscrolling with reading or music
✅ Hydrate before caffeine
✅ Schedule downtime intentionally
✅ Reflect before bed — one gratitude note


How-To: Build a Personal Stress Management Routine

  1. Identify Your Stress Type: Physical (tension, fatigue), emotional (irritability), or cognitive (racing thoughts).
  2. Set Micro Habits: Replace “I’ll work out daily” with “I’ll stretch for 5 minutes after waking.”
  3. Design Your Calm Space: Add soothing cues — natural light, calm scents, a playlist from Spotify’s Peaceful Piano.
  4. Track Feedback: Review weekly — what helped most?
  5. Adjust: Stress evolves. So should your system.

Table: Practical Methods for Stress Regulation

CategoryStrategyTools/ResourcesFrequency
PhysicalWalking, yoga, or light exerciseYoga JournalDaily
EmotionalJournaling or gratitude writingPenzu3x per week
CognitiveBreathing and reframingCalmDaily
SocialConnect with othersMeetupWeekly
EnvironmentalDeclutter, scent therapyIKEA Home InspirationAs needed

Safe, Natural Approaches for Relaxation

Beyond conventional stress relief, several natural approaches can help stabilize your mood and improve focus:

  • Ashwagandha: A well-researched adaptogen known to lower cortisol and improve resilience.
  • THCa: Found in THCa-based wellness products, it offers calming effects without intoxication, supporting relaxation safely when used responsibly. Explore the properties of THCa distillate
  • Meditation & Breathwork: Practices like alternate-nostril breathing and guided meditations on Insight Timer balance the nervous system naturally.

Finding Fulfillment Through Growth

Sometimes, stress signals that it’s time for change. Many find renewal by investing in education or skill-building. Returning to school — especially online — allows flexible growth without overwhelming your schedule. If you work in healthcare, you can choose an online healthcare administration degree to expand leadership potential and influence systemic improvements. Online programs also offer the freedom to learn at your own pace while balancing life and work.


Spotlight: Product That Promotes Relaxation


Weighted blankets have gained traction for their deep-touch stimulation, helping reduce anxiety and improve sleep quality. Brands like Gravity Blanket are designed to emulate therapeutic pressure, creating calm for the body and mind.


FAQs

Q1: What’s the fastest way to calm down in a tense moment?
A: Try box breathing — inhale 4s, hold 4s, exhale 4s, hold 4s. Repeat for 1–2 minutes.

Q2: Can stress ever be good?
A: Yes. Short bursts can boost motivation and focus. Chronic stress, however, leads to burnout.

Q3: How much exercise is enough?
A: Even 20 minutes of moderate movement per day can lower stress hormones.

Q4: Should I eliminate caffeine?
A: Not necessarily — balance it with hydration and don’t consume it late in the day.

Q5: What’s a simple bedtime habit to improve calm?
A: Write down three things you’re grateful for — it rewires attention away from worry.


Glossary

  • Cortisol: The primary stress hormone regulating alertness and energy balance.
  • Adaptogen: A natural compound that helps the body adapt to stress.
  • Mindfulness: Non-judgmental awareness of the present moment.
  • Homeostasis: The body’s tendency to maintain internal balance.
  • Neuroplasticity: The brain’s ability to change through experience.

Managing stress is ultimately about creating balance, not chasing perfection. Small, consistent habits — from mindful breathing to intentional rest — can dramatically shift how you experience daily challenges. By recognizing your limits and building supportive routines, you strengthen both emotional and physical resilience. With practice, calm becomes less of a goal and more of a natural way of living.

Graphic: Freepik.

Stags’ Leap Winery Petite Sirah 2020

Petite Sirah from Napa Valley, California

Purchase Price: $19.00

James Suckling 94, Gismondi 92, Wine Enthusiast 92, Cellar Tracker 92, Robert Parker 90, Wine and Spirits 89, ElsBob 89

ABV 14.5%

A very dark ruby, purple hue wine with aromas of black fruits. On the palate more of a red fruit, cherry flavor, with a little spice, mainly pepper. High in acidity and tannins, medium-full bodied, with very little balance. Fortunately, the finish is short. To help smooth out the acidity and tannic nature of this wine try it with aged cheeses such as Gouda or tomato-based dishes like pasta or pizza.

A very good fine wine overpriced at $19. If you can find it under $12 give it a try. Current prices range from about $28-65. A decent wine but far below Stags’ Leap quality reputation. I’m surprised they put their label on this one.

Trivia: Stag’s Leap Winery is located along the Silverado Trail in Napa Valley. The trail originally built in 1852, links the cinnabar mines (HgS, mercury sulfide) on Mount St. Helena in the north to San Pablo Bay, the estuarine gateway to San Francisco Bay; natural bookends to the valley. In addition to abundant mercury deposits, the mines also yielded silver, sparking a short-lived silver rush beginning in 1858.

Highwayman Black Bart preyed on stagecoaches along the trail in the 1880s, adding to the outlaw mystique of the region, and inspiring a minor character in The Simpsons. The non-Simpson Bart left rhymed messages at the scene of his robberies earning the moniker ‘The Poet Bandit.’ He was captured in 1883 and served 4 years in San Quentin, regrettably missing Johnny Cash’s concert by about 81 years.

In 1880, Robert Louis Stevenson honeymooned in Napa Valley with his wife Fanny, spending the summer squatting in an abandoned bunkhouse at the Silverado Mine (a spendthrift, to be sure–actually, he was broke, destitute, poor, penniless, and sick), on the slopes of Mount St. Helena. The experience led to his travel memoir The Silverado Squatters, which, while not a blockbuster, did manage to sell enough to justify a second printing. Interestingly, it can still be purchased from independent publishers. It’s a short book of about 100+ pages. Give it a read and compare it with the Bermuda travelogues of his contemporary, Mark Twain.

Gold in the Middle Kingdom

In November 2024, China’s state media announced the discovery of a “supergiant” gold deposit in the Wangu Gold Field, Hunan Province. Initial exploration and delineation drilling confirmed approximately 300 metric tons (9,645,225 troy ounces) in place. Subsequent geologic modeling suggests that the total resource may exceed 1000 metric tons (32,150,750 troy ounces), potentially making it the largest known deposit in the world.

At the current October 2025 gold price of $4,267.30 per ounce that equates to about $137.3 billion in gross value assuming an unrealistic 100% recovery.

But is all this gold recoverable without sinking vast capital only to lose more in the process? Public data remains limited, yet a ballpark estimate is possible.

Incorporating global subsurface mining economics, the project, assuming a capital expenditure of $12.5 billion and operating costs of $2100 per ounce, would be profitable. Its projected return of 17% is respectable but far from spectacular (more on this below). Not the proverbial gold mine, but a respectable sovereign nest egg, nonetheless.

However, when factoring in a 40% chance of technical success, the projects’ risk-adjusted return drops below 7%, falling short of industry’s typical 10% threshold. In economic terms, the project fails; at least under current conditions and postulated costs.

The deposit is hosted in Neoproterozoic, between 1 billion to 538 million years ago, sandy and silty slates within the Jiangnan orogenic belt. It comprises over 40 quartz-sulfide veins, located from 2000-3000 meters (6500-9850 feet), and associated with north-west trending faults.

The main ore body, V2, averages 1.76 meters in thickness with the other veins ranging from 0.5 to 5 meters with a maximum of 14 meters collectively spanning several square kilometers (exact areal extent remains unpublished). Published average gold grade is stated at 6-8 grams of gold per ton with exceptionally rich veins reaching a world class 138 grams per ton.

At depths of 2,000-3,000 meters, Wangu enters the realm of ultra-deep mining. Compounding that depth challenge is a blistering geothermal gradient, placing the gold-bearing rock in a roasting 110-200 degrees Celsius (230-392 degrees Fahrenheit), temperatures far beyond human endurance without extreme and prohibitively expensive cooling. Robotic retrieval of the resource becomes essential.

To reduce human risk in high-temperature zones, autonomous mining systems will be the default standard. These will include robotic cutters and remote rock loaders, guided by AI software to navigate the narrow veins. Engineering challenges abound: thermal degradation of electronics, lubricant breakdown, sensor failures, and a multitude of other factors. Even in a robotic environment cooling infrastructure, such as ice slurry plants and high-capacity ventilation, will likely be required, adding significantly to the overall operating costs.

At these depths in a highly faulted regime, rock plasticity and instability add to the risk and costs of recovery.

Wangu’s extreme technical demands evoke parallels with deepwater oil exploration and spaceflight, domains where success has come only through phased engineering, initial high costs, and extensive testing. The project may draw on space-grade alloys and ceramics, deepwater telemetry and control, thermal shielding from reentry vehicles, and autonomous navigation from off-Earth rovers.

China’s mining expertise and Hunan’s infrastructure; power grids, skilled labor, automated systems, may mitigate some of these challenges. Still, the scale and depth of the deposit suggest a complex, phased engineering operation. Development will likely proceed vein-by-vein, shallow to deep, prioritizing high-grade zones to maximize early returns and to refine the learning curve.

Estimating a timeline for this project involves multiple phases: feasibility studies, including geotechnical, thermal, and remote sensing analysis, possibly running from 2028 till 2030. With state support, permitting and financing may be expedited, taking only 1 or 2 years. Construction of shafts, cooling systems, and robotic infrastructure may take another 5-8 years. Commissioning, de-bottlenecking, and problem-solving would add another 1-2 years before peak capacity is reached.

If all proceeds smoothly, first gold may be achieved in 12-15 years. However, given the extreme technical challenges, a more realistic horizon is 15-20 years. In a perfect world first gold may be expected between 2040-2045.

Achieving first gold will likely require $10-15 billion in capital expenditure, with operating costs estimated at $1800-2400 per ounce over a 20-year life of mine and 90% resource recovery. Assuming a starting gold price of $4270 per ounce and a 5% annual growth, the project yields an initial IRR of about 17%. But when factoring in the 40% chance of technical success, across geotechnical, thermal, and robotic domains, the risk-adjusted IRR drops below 7%, rendering the project uneconomic under current conditions. Expect years of recycling before this project is formally sanctioned.

Still in a world increasingly skeptical of fiat currencies, Wangu is more than a source of gold, it is a sovereign hedge, a deep Chinese vault of wealth to anchor a post-fiat strategy.

By way of comparison, Fort Knox reportedly holds 147.3 million troy ounces of gold. Additional U.S. government holdings in Denver, New York, West Point, and other sites brings the total to 261.5 million troy ounces; worth roughly $1.1 trillion at today’s prices. The Chinese government officially holds about 74 million troy ounces worth about $315.6 billion. Wangu could theoretically increase China’s gold holdings by 43%.

Graphic: Gold veins in a host rock.