Black Swans Part II

Last week, we introduced Taleb’s definition of black swans; rare, unpredictable ‘unknown unknowns’ in military terms, with major impacts, exploring historical examples that reshaped society post-event. This week I’m going to introduce a fictional black swan and how to react to them but before that the unpredictable part of Taleb’s definition needs some modifications. True black swans by Taleb definition are not only rare but practically non-existent outside of natural disasters such as earthquakes. To discuss a black swan, I am going to change the definition a bit and say these events are unpredictable to most observers but predictable or at least imaginable to some. Taleb would likely call them grey swans. For instance, Sputnik was known to the Soviets, but an intelligence failure and complete surprise to the rest of the world. Nikola Tesla anticipated the iPhone 81 years ahead of time. 9/11 was known to the perpetrators and was an intelligence failure. Staging a significant part of your naval fleet in Pearl Harbor during a world war and forgetting to surveil the surrounding area is not a black swan, just incompetence.

With that tweak out of the way, we’ll explore in Part II where Taleb discusses strategies to mitigate a black (grey) swan’s major impacts with a fictional example. His strategies can be applied to pre-swan events as well as post-swan. Pre-swan planning in business is called contingency planning, risk management, or, you guessed it, black swan planning. They include prioritizing redundancy, flexibility, robustness, and simplicity, as well as preparing for extremes, fostering experimentation, and embracing antifragility.

Imagine a modern black swan: a relentless AI generated cyberattack cripples the Federal Reserve and banking system, wiping out reserves and assets. Industry and services collapse nationwide and globally as capital evaporates, straining essentials, with recovery decades away if ever. After the shock comes analysis and damage reports, then the rebuilding begins.

The Treasury, with no liquid assets, must renegotiate debt to preserve global trust. Defense capabilities are maintained at a sufficient level, hopefully hardened, to protect national security, while the State Department reimagines the world to effectively bolster domestic production and resource independence while keeping the wolves at bay.

Non-essential programs, from expansive infrastructure projects, research, federal education initiatives, all non-essential services are shelved, shifting priorities and remaining resources to maintaining core social and population safety nets like Social Security and Defense. Emergency measures kick in: targeted taxes on luxury goods and wealth are imposed to boost revenue and redirect resources. Tariffs encourage domestic production and independence.

Federal funding to states and localities is reduced to a trickle. States and municipalities must take ownership of essential public services such as education, water, roads, and public safety. The states are forced to retrench and innovate, turning federal scarcity into local progress.

Looking ahead, resilience becomes the first principle. Diversification takes center stage, with the creation of a sovereign wealth fund based on assets like gold, bitcoin, and commodities, bolstered by states that had stockpiled reserves such as rainy-day funds, ensuring financial stability. Local agriculture, leaner industries and a realigned electrical grid, freed from federal oversight, innovate under pressure, strengthening a recovery. Resilience becomes antifragility, the need to build stronger and better in the face of adversity. And finally, the government must revert to its Lockean and Jeffersonian roots, favoring liberty and growth over control, safety, and stagnation: anti-fragility.

Source: The Black Swan by Nassim Nicholas Taleb, 2007. Graphic: The Black Swan hardback cover.

Falcon Heavy

Seven Years ago on 6 February 2018, SpaceX’s Falcon Heavy made its maiden voyage, carrying a Tesla Roadster with Starman in the driver’s seat. The rocket is designed to go beyond low Earth orbit but is not certified to carry any sentient biologics.

Recently, astronomers affiliated with Harvard announced the discovery of an asteroid in an orbit uncomfortably close to Earth. Further research by the red-faced researchers revealed that it was the Tesla roadster launched by SpaceX in 2018. The Tesla is in a heliocentric orbit and is currently on its second trip around the sun, according to Pearson.

To date, Falcon Heavy has inserted 11 payloads into GEO, GTO, HEO, LEO, and heliocentric orbits. It has up to 10 more missions scheduled through 2028. Eventually, the rocket will supposedly be retired when Starship is fully operational.

Source: US News. Person. CNET. Graphic: Falcon Heavy Demo Mission, 2018, copyright SpaceX. Falcon Heavy First Launch 6 February 2018, copyright SpaceX.

Journalism – Denver Post 2024

I’ve been running a weekly post on the shortcomings and biases within the news media complex since April of 2024, starting with Walter Duranty of the New York Times covering for Stalin’s forced collectivization of Ukrainian farms in 1929. Duranty claimed in 1933 that no Ukrainian’s died of starvation even though estimates stated that up to 5 million did die from severe ‘food shortage’ in Timesman’s words.

I’ve attempted to cover just the most egregious and mendacious examples of media malpractice over the last 9 months amounting to about 30 posts spanning about 95 years of print and broadcast journalism. One thing that has become clear over that time is reporting hasn’t improved; fabrications, prevarications, and deceptions still appear to be the currency of the realm. Objective and factual journalism only appears when there are no winners or losers, a rare occurrence indeed.

So, let’s start off the new year with the Denver Post’s initial headline documenting the attempt on Trump’s life at his Butler rally on 13 July 2024: “Gunman Dies in Attack.” A major candidate for the presidency is almost killed and the paper’s concern is for the assassin.

After taking considerable flak for that headline the Post scrubbed the headline from their website and replaced it with “Trump is injured but ‘fine’…

Graphic: Front Page Denver Post, via Charlie Kirk, 14 July 2024, X.

Journalism—CNN’s Sycophants for Saddam Hussein 2003

CNN’s news chief in 2003, Eason Jordan, admitted that the network ignored and suppressed Saddam Hussein’s mass killings of his citizens and other crimes against humanity, to keep their access to the Iraqi thug. Jordan said that telling the truth likely would have meant closing their Baghdad bureau. Franklin Foer of the New Republic wrote in The Wall Street Journal: “CNN could have abandoned Baghdad. Not only would they have stopped recycling lies, they could have focused more intently on obtaining the truth about Saddam.”

CNN lied; Iraqis died.

Human Rights Watch has estimated that 250,000 to 290,000 Iraqis were presumed killed under Saddam.

Eason Jordan resigned from CNN in 2005. It wasn’t possible to discover why he wasn’t fired in 2003 for his efforts to aid Saddam Hussein.

Source: The Washington Post. HRW 2003. Franklin Foer, Wall Street Journal 2003.   Graphic: Iraqi Victims Found in a Mass Grave killed under Saddam’s Rule, GWB Whitehouse Archives, 2003.

Journalism – Scott Thomas Beauchamp

In 2007 The New Republic published three articles by an American Army private, Scott Thomas Beauchamp serving in Iraq titled “Shock Troops”, detailing misdeeds and possible war crimes occurring in and near his forward operating base, Falcon, in Bagdad. The articles were, in part, fact checked by The New Republic Fact-Checker Elspeth Reeve who was also Private Beauchamp’s wife.

Beauchamp claimed that army personnel found mass graves that contained children, and targeted wild dogs for fun, and Beauchamp horribly insulted a woman disfigured by an IED.

The US Army and other news outlets could find no collaboration or substantiation for the events described by Beauchamp. In late 2007 The New Republic stated that they could no longer stand by Beauchamp’s stories.

Reeve is currently a correspondent for CNN. There is no information on the current activities or whereabouts of Beauchamp.

Source:  Fog of War, The New Republic.  Alchetron, 2024. Graphic: Beauchamp by Alchetron, copyright unknown.

Florida Today

The Courage to Be Free

By Ron DeSantis

Broadside Books

Copyright: © 2023

AmazonPicture

DeSantis Biography and Courage to Be Free:

At the end of the day, I’m fighting for the things I said I’d fight for.” – Ron DeSantis

Courage to Be Free is the Florida governor’s biography with a good measure of politics, vision and American government thrown in. It’s a simple read from someone selling himself as an authentic American and an honest and ethical broker who supports the citizens through good government.

Ron Desantis was born in Jacksonville, Florida in 1978, married Casey Black in 2009, and has three children, two girls and a boy. He attended Yale and graduated in 2001 with a B.A. A year later he entered Harvard and graduated with a law degree in 2005. During law school he was commissioned as an officer in the U.S. Navy. In 2007 he was assigned as a legal advisor to SEAL Team One in Fallujah, Iraq where he was awarded the Bronze Star.

In 2012 he was elected to the U.S. House of Representatives and was re-elected in 2014 and 2016. DeSantis decided not to run for re-election to the House for the 2018 term but instead competed for the Florida governorship which he won. He won re-election in 2022 and as he is term limited by Florida law will not seek that office in 2024. Since he has dropped out of the Presidential race what he does next is an open question.

The first half of Desantis’ book is dedicated to his biography followed by his vision of government and national policy. He draws heavily on the expository essays and articles within the Federalist Papers and their vision for a constitutional republic. The authors of the Federalist Papers, Madison, Hamilton, and Jay argue strenuously for a republican form of government and against direct democracy which one could paraphrase in slang terms as mob rule. DeSantis agrees.

His political philosophy is simple in principle, excoriatingly difficult in execution. Encapsulating his thoughts he states, “The right path forward is not difficult to identify; it just requires using basic common sense and applying core American values…” He follows this up with his blueprint for Florida and America: “Be willing to lead, have the courage of your convictions, deliver for your constituents, and reap the political rewards.” Reaping the political rewards sounds like every politician that has ever walked the face of this Earth and I don’t recognize that as a positive trait.

Literary Criticism:

Courage to Be Free was a number one bestseller in the New York Times, Wallstreet Journal, Amazon, and Publisher’s Weekly shortly after it was released in 2023. Although sales figures are almost impossible to find, for free, the book had an initial print run of 250,000. There hasn’t been a second printing.

Hagiographies are one sided affairs with nary a discouraging word to be found, with sainthood lurking right around the corner. DeSantis autobiography is a hagiography but in fairness one doesn’t provide his opposition with free negative research when your goal is to introduce yourself to the public.

This book had only one purpose, to launch DeSantis into the 2024 presidential Republican primary in the best possible light and as a bonus, get your targeted audience to pay for it by purchasing the book. It admirably accomplishes the task, but it certainly is not a literary masterpiece, rather it reads like a college term paper completed under duress. Simple, direct, with no flowery prose or memorable lines. If you want to learn something about this man, give it perusal, a quick read is all it needs and watch one or two of his Republican primary debates for additional elucidation.

The only reason I read this book was because of the title: The Courage to Be Free. It reminded me of the title of John F. Kennedy’s Profiles in Courage. Kennedy’s book employs a better writing style but that is because Kennedy didn’t author his book. In a previous post I stated who did and I’ll leave it to you to look it up if you are curious. In the end both are about embellishing their respective reputations. Mission accomplished.

References and Readings: