Gold in the Middle Kingdom

In November 2024, China’s state media announced the discovery of a “supergiant” gold deposit in the Wangu Gold Field, Hunan Province. Initial exploration and delineation drilling confirmed approximately 300 metric tons (9,645,225 troy ounces) in place. Subsequent geologic modeling suggests that the total resource may exceed 1000 metric tons (32,150,750 troy ounces), potentially making it the largest known deposit in the world.

At the current October 2025 gold price of $4,267.30 per ounce that equates to about $137.3 billion in gross value assuming an unrealistic 100% recovery.

But is all this gold recoverable without sinking vast capital only to lose more in the process? Public data remains limited, yet a ballpark estimate is possible.

Incorporating global subsurface mining economics, the project, assuming a capital expenditure of $12.5 billion and operating costs of $2100 per ounce, would be profitable. Its projected return of 17% is respectable but far from spectacular (more on this below). Not the proverbial gold mine, but a respectable sovereign nest egg, nonetheless.

However, when factoring in a 40% chance of technical success, the projects’ risk-adjusted return drops below 7%, falling short of industry’s typical 10% threshold. In economic terms, the project fails; at least under current conditions and postulated costs.

The deposit is hosted in Neoproterozoic, between 1 billion to 538 million years ago, sandy and silty slates within the Jiangnan orogenic belt. It comprises over 40 quartz-sulfide veins, located from 2000-3000 meters (6500-9850 feet), and associated with north-west trending faults.

The main ore body, V2, averages 1.76 meters in thickness with the other veins ranging from 0.5 to 5 meters with a maximum of 14 meters collectively spanning several square kilometers (exact areal extent remains unpublished). Published average gold grade is stated at 6-8 grams of gold per ton with exceptionally rich veins reaching a world class 138 grams per ton.

At depths of 2,000-3,000 meters, Wangu enters the realm of ultra-deep mining. Compounding that depth challenge is a blistering geothermal gradient, placing the gold-bearing rock in a roasting 110-200 degrees Celsius (230-392 degrees Fahrenheit), temperatures far beyond human endurance without extreme and prohibitively expensive cooling. Robotic retrieval of the resource becomes essential.

To reduce human risk in high-temperature zones, autonomous mining systems will be the default standard. These will include robotic cutters and remote rock loaders, guided by AI software to navigate the narrow veins. Engineering challenges abound: thermal degradation of electronics, lubricant breakdown, sensor failures, and a multitude of other factors. Even in a robotic environment cooling infrastructure, such as ice slurry plants and high-capacity ventilation, will likely be required, adding significantly to the overall operating costs.

At these depths in a highly faulted regime, rock plasticity and instability add to the risk and costs of recovery.

Wangu’s extreme technical demands evoke parallels with deepwater oil exploration and spaceflight, domains where success has come only through phased engineering, initial high costs, and extensive testing. The project may draw on space-grade alloys and ceramics, deepwater telemetry and control, thermal shielding from reentry vehicles, and autonomous navigation from off-Earth rovers.

China’s mining expertise and Hunan’s infrastructure; power grids, skilled labor, automated systems, may mitigate some of these challenges. Still, the scale and depth of the deposit suggest a complex, phased engineering operation. Development will likely proceed vein-by-vein, shallow to deep, prioritizing high-grade zones to maximize early returns and to refine the learning curve.

Estimating a timeline for this project involves multiple phases: feasibility studies, including geotechnical, thermal, and remote sensing analysis, possibly running from 2028 till 2030. With state support, permitting and financing may be expedited, taking only 1 or 2 years. Construction of shafts, cooling systems, and robotic infrastructure may take another 5-8 years. Commissioning, de-bottlenecking, and problem-solving would add another 1-2 years before peak capacity is reached.

If all proceeds smoothly, first gold may be achieved in 12-15 years. However, given the extreme technical challenges, a more realistic horizon is 15-20 years. In a perfect world first gold may be expected between 2040-2045.

Achieving first gold will likely require $10-15 billion in capital expenditure, with operating costs estimated at $1800-2400 per ounce over a 20-year life of mine and 90% resource recovery. Assuming a starting gold price of $4270 per ounce and a 5% annual growth, the project yields an initial IRR of about 17%. But when factoring in the 40% chance of technical success, across geotechnical, thermal, and robotic domains, the risk-adjusted IRR drops below 7%, rendering the project uneconomic under current conditions. Expect years of recycling before this project is formally sanctioned.

Still in a world increasingly skeptical of fiat currencies, Wangu is more than a source of gold, it is a sovereign hedge, a deep Chinese vault of wealth to anchor a post-fiat strategy.

By way of comparison, Fort Knox reportedly holds 147.3 million troy ounces of gold. Additional U.S. government holdings in Denver, New York, West Point, and other sites brings the total to 261.5 million troy ounces; worth roughly $1.1 trillion at today’s prices. The Chinese government officially holds about 74 million troy ounces worth about $315.6 billion. Wangu could theoretically increase China’s gold holdings by 43%.

Graphic: Gold veins in a host rock.

Water Everywhere

Two recent Earth science studies by Barrett et al. and Bermingham et al. explore the origins of Earth’s water and indirectly, organic matter, key prerequisites for the development of intelligent life. Their findings support the early delivery of needed chemicals to form water and carbon molecules by inner and outer solar system planetesimals such as asteroids and comets.

Barrett et al. shows that an inner solar system sourced enstatite chondrite (EC) asteroid found in Antarctica is isotopically similar to Earth material, (not surprisingly, this supports the 270-year-old Nebular Hypothesis) capable of delivering substantial hydrogen during Earth’s accretionary phase (~4.56–4.5 billion years ago). The ECs contain hydrogen as H2S in silicate glass, linked to pyrrhotite, sufficient to account for up to 14 times Earth’s ocean mass. This hydrogen was systematically incorporated in the hot inner solar system via nebular processes, suggesting water was an inherent outcome of Earth’s formation, not a later addition. ECs also contain trace organic matter contributing modestly to Earth’s carbon inventory. Despite the chaotic “billiard table” trajectories of early solar system collisions, the stability of H2S in glass ensured survival during violent accretion. This early delivery of water and organics established a foundational habitable environment, priming the Earth’s prebiotic chemistry for the creation and evolution of intelligent life.

Bermingham et al., taking a different investigative track, analyze molybdenum isotopes in meteorites and Earth’s crust, concluding that water was delivered during the Late Heavy Bombardment (LHB: 4.1–3.8 billion years ago) by planetesimals, including inner solar system asteroids and outer solar system comets, as hydrous minerals or brine. This late accretion, post-Moon-forming event (4.5 billion years ago), suggests a stochastic bombardment enriched Earth’s surface volatiles. Comets and carbonaceous chondrites, rich in organic matter, likely delivered significant carbon compounds, enhancing the prebiotic chemical environment. The chaotic early solar system facilitated this influx of outer solar system organics, complementing earlier inputs.

Both studies align with life’s prerequisites by ensuring water and organic delivery to the planet. Barrett et al. provide the bulk water budget and trace organics via ECs, creating an early aqueous environment, while Bermingham et al.’s LHB bombardment added more water and substantial organics, boosting conditions for life’s emergence. They agree on asteroids’ role, possibly including ECs, but differ in timing (early accretion vs. LHB) and outer solar system delivery contributions (minor in Barrett, significant via comets in Bermingham). Barrett et al.’s early delivery of water and organics can be viewed as foundational and Bermingham et al.’s LHB as a surface-enriching supplement, together enabling the chemical and evolutionary path to intelligent life.

Source: Barrett et al, 2025, Icarus. Bermingham et al, 2025, Rutgers. Graphic: Comet Cometh, Grok3.

Geo Anomalies

NASA has identified the South Atlantic Magnetic Anomaly (SAA) as a region off the coast of South America, where Earth’s magnetic field is significantly weaker. This weakening reduces magnetic shielding, exposing satellites and spacecraft to higher levels of radiation and posing a risk to their operation. Understanding the causes and implications of the SAA is essential for addressing these LEO challenges.

One hypothesis suggests that irregularities at the core-mantle boundary disrupt the geodynamo, the mechanism generating Earth’s magnetic field. The anomaly’s alignment with submarine volcanic features hints at possible links between mantle-crust interactions and magnetic disturbances. Additionally, a hotspot near the Mid-Atlantic Ridge corresponds to a geomagnetic intensity minimum at the core-mantle boundary, implying that thermal and compositional anomalies in the mantle may affect convection in the molten outer core, creating localized variations in the magnetic field.

Further research using subsurface imaging will help in uncovering the internal processes shaping Earth’s magnetic field and enhancing our understanding of the planet’s protective geodynamo.also assist in predicting magnetic anomalies and their effect on LEO space flight in the future.

Source: NASA. Graphic. Core Geomagnetic Anomaly, NASA.

You Are Here: Now What?

Return of the God Hypothesis

By Stephen C. Meyers

Published by HarperOne

Copyright: © 2021

An interesting if not an enlightening, but thoroughly tedious treatise.

Meyer, in excruciating detail, examines the evidence for a universe designed, created, and set into motion by the hand of God. His proofs assess how the universe is perfectly tuned to foster our existence, how human DNA’s complexity is beyond random chance, and how the explosion of multi-celled life forms during the Cambrian Period (485-539 mya (million years ago)) is unlikely Darwinian in nature.

The first two proofs are plausible, and his arguments are meticulously developed, while the Cambrian explosion of life does not address the hundreds of millions to a billion years of missing rock section prior to the beginning to the Cambrian Period. The explosion of life may simply be a function of where one begins to sample the evidence.

Meyer’s case for God orchestrating our existence is convincing but you only need to read Part II, about 150 pages in the hardback version of the book, while the other 300 pages can be consigned to doctoral students in logic and religion.